Volume 8, Issue 2 (2022)
J. Insect Biodivers. Syst 2022, 8(2): 175-182 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Alichi M. The cutting edge of the lock-and-key hypothesis in weevils: a case study of Sitona fairmairei (Coleoptera, Curculionidae). J. Insect Biodivers. Syst 2022; 8 (2) :175-182
URL: http://jibs.modares.ac.ir/article-36-57949-en.html
URL: http://jibs.modares.ac.ir/article-36-57949-en.html
Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. , aalichi@shirazu.ac.ir
Abstract: (2205 Views)
View on Scopus
According to a perspective, male and female copulatory organs have not more extreme morphologies. However, a skewed bias in males, -as well as the scanty taxonomic data on female genitalia, may explain why most evolutionary biologists failed to find acceptable evidence for the reproductive co-evolution in insects. A recent finding shows that the mechanical footing has a cooperative essence in the weevil genus Sitona. In this viewpoint, successful mating is achieved by the dynamic correspondence between the male endophallus and female genital lumen. The present work addresses some missing evidence in the genital traits of this taxon that may keep the hampered comprehensions under lock and key. The female bursal lumen in the studied species is provisioned with a pair of forklift-shaped structures (named the “codelocks”) that may provide for stabilizing the characteristic position of the male bio-syringe during copulation. This structure varies between the species based on the shape and direction of its paired levers, so that an elaborate algorithm possibly serves as the fuel of this device. However, in one of these, Sitona fairmairei (Allard, 1869), the levers perform a dual function in accordance to the lockback mechanism of the male copulatory organ. This species is also featured for having several campaniform mechano-receptors on the flanges of the male bio-syringe which are involved in the in-vivo navigation of this armature towards female spermathecal duct.
According to a perspective, male and female copulatory organs have not more extreme morphologies. However, a skewed bias in males, -as well as the scanty taxonomic data on female genitalia, may explain why most evolutionary biologists failed to find acceptable evidence for the reproductive co-evolution in insects. A recent finding shows that the mechanical footing has a cooperative essence in the weevil genus Sitona. In this viewpoint, successful mating is achieved by the dynamic correspondence between the male endophallus and female genital lumen. The present work addresses some missing evidence in the genital traits of this taxon that may keep the hampered comprehensions under lock and key. The female bursal lumen in the studied species is provisioned with a pair of forklift-shaped structures (named the “codelocks”) that may provide for stabilizing the characteristic position of the male bio-syringe during copulation. This structure varies between the species based on the shape and direction of its paired levers, so that an elaborate algorithm possibly serves as the fuel of this device. However, in one of these, Sitona fairmairei (Allard, 1869), the levers perform a dual function in accordance to the lockback mechanism of the male copulatory organ. This species is also featured for having several campaniform mechano-receptors on the flanges of the male bio-syringe which are involved in the in-vivo navigation of this armature towards female spermathecal duct.
Article Type: Research Article |
Subject:
Systematics/Coleoptera
Received: 2021/12/17 | Accepted: 2022/01/12 | Published: 2022/03/9
Received: 2021/12/17 | Accepted: 2022/01/12 | Published: 2022/03/9
References
1. Agrawal, S., Grimaldi, D. & Fox, J.L. (2017) Haltere morphology and campaniform sensilla arrangement across Diptera. Arthropod Structure & Development, 46 (2), 215-229. [DOI:10.1016/j.asd.2017.01.005]
2. Ah-King, M., Barron, A.B. & Herberstein, M.E. (2014) Genital evolution: why are females still undescribed? PLoS Biol., 12 (5): e1001851. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001851]
3. Alichi, M. (2021) A bio-syringe mechanism and the pattern of genital correspondence in the weevil genus Sitona (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): an approach to the great interest of Sharp and Muir. Zootaxa, 4933 (4), 514-526. [DOI:10.11646/zootaxa.4933.4.3]
4. Alichi, M. & Minaei, K. (2021) Dynamics of a cooperative lock-and-key model in genital matching of Sitona Germar (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Insect Biodiversity and Systematics, 7 (4), 467-476. [DOI:10.52547/jibs.7.4.467]
5. Brennan, P.L.R. & Prum, R.O. (2015) Mechanisms and evidence of genital coevolution: the roles of natural selection, mate choice, and sexual conflict. Cold Spring Harbors Perspectives in Biology, 7, a017749. [DOI:10.1101/cshperspect.a017749]
6. Eberhard, W.G. & Ramirez, N. (2004) Functional morphology of the male genitalia of four species of Drosophila: Failure to confirm both lock and key and male-female conflict predictions. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 97 (5/1), 1007-1017. [DOI:10.1603/0013-8746(2004)097[1007:FMOTMG]2.0.CO;2]
7. Hosken, DJ. & Stockley, P. (2004) Sexual selection and genital evolution. Trends in Ecological Evolution, 19, 87-93. [DOI:10.1016/j.tree.2003.11.012]
8. Kelly, D.A. & Moore, B.C. (2016) The morphological diversity of intromittent organs. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 56 (4), 630-634. [DOI:10.1093/icb/icw103]
9. Koshland, D.E. (1994) The Key-Lock theory and the induced fit theory. Angewandte Chemie 33, 2375-2378. [DOI:10.1002/anie.199423751]
10. Méndez, V. & Córdoba-Aguilar, A. (2004) Sexual selection and animal genitalia. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19 (5), 224-225. [DOI:10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.012]
11. Mikkola, K. (2008) The lock-and-key mechanisms of the internal genitalia of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): How are they selected for? European Journal of Entomology, 105 (1), 13-25. 2 [DOI:10.14411/eje.2008.002]
12. Morrow, E.H., Arnqvist, G. & Pitnick, S. (2003) Adaptation versus pleiotropy: why do males harm their mates? Behavioral Ecology, 14 (6), 802-806. [DOI:10.1093/beheco/arg073]
13. Rudoy, A., Beutel, R.G. & Ribera, I. (2016) Evolution of the male genitalia in the genus Limnebius Leach, 1815 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1-31. [DOI:10.1111/zoj.12402]
14. Shapiro, A.M. & Porter, A.H. (1989) The lock-and-key hypothesis: Evolutionary and biosystematic interpretation of insect genitalia, Annual Review of Entomology, 34, 231-245. [DOI:10.1146/annurev.en.34.010189.001311]
15. Sharp, D. & Muir, F. (1912) The comparative anatomy of the male genital tube in Coleoptera. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London, 60, 477-642. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2311.1912.tb03107.x]
16. Tuxen, S.L. (1970) Taxonomist's Glossary of Genitalia in Insects. Scandinavian University Munksgaard, Copenhagen, Denmark.
17. Zhou, Y.L., Zhou, H.Z., Ski, A.L. & Beutel, R.G. (2020) Evolution of a hyper-complex intromittent organ in rove beetles - the endophallus of Xantholinini (Staphylinidae: Coleoptera). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 188, 1277-1295. [DOI:10.1093/zoolinnean/zlz116]
18. Zill, S.N., Chaudhry, S., Büschges, A. & Schmitz, J. (2013) Directional specificity and encoding of muscle forces and loads by stick insect tibial campaniform sensilla, including receptors with round cuticular caps. Arthropod Structure & Development, 42 (6), 455-467. [DOI:10.1016/j.asd.2013.10.001]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |